Video Software Dealers Association v. Schwarzenegger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to “read Ginsberg as reaching beyond the context of restrictions on sexually-explicit materials or as creating an entirely new category of expression—speech as to minors—excepted from First Amendment protections”
• government bears the burden of proof in the criminal context
• “The Supreme Court has carefully limited obscenity to sexual content.”
• “The Supreme Court has carefully limited obscenity to sexual content.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).