Skip to main content
· 8/4/2010

Vidal v. SunTrust Bank

Citations

  • 41 So. 3d 401
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11288
  • 2010 WL 3023386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when a defendant is .not personally served, “the statute requires that the process server orally inform the person who receives service of the contents of .the complaint”
  • noting that when a defendant is not personally served, “the statute requires that the process server orally inform the person who receives service of the contents of the complaint”
  • noting that when a defendant is not personally served, “the statute requires that the process server orally inform the. person who receives service of the contents of the complaint. These requirements ensure that- notice is conveyed to the defendant.”
  • “Noting the time and date of service on the copy of the summons left with the person to be served does not insure that the defendant receives due process notice.”
  • “The validity of the original service must first be determined before the trial court can rule on the pending motion [to quash the second service].”
  • “The validity of the original service must first be determined before the trial court can rule on the pending motion [to quash the second service].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.