Victoria Rosales Jesus Rosales Rebecca Rosales v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that malpractice claim did not accrue in part because plaintiffs “relied on the assurances of the doctors that no harm had in fact occurred”
• holding that if a federal court determines 11 that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction at any time during a dispute, the court must 12 dismiss the action
• “For several months after Victoria was born, doctors repeatedly assured the Rosaleses that the child’s lazy lid was temporary and that no injury was present.”
• “Ordinarily, a plaintiff cannot be expected to discover the general medical cause of his injury even before the doctors themselves are able to do so.”
• statute of limitations did not start to run until doctors diagnosed both the injury of retardation and its cause
• “Ordinarily, a plaintiff cannot be expected to discover the general medical cause of his injury even before the doctors themselves are able to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).