Victor Varela v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Blakely and United States v. Booker, 542 U.S. 220, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), are not retroactive on collateral review
• holding \that Booker 's constitutional rule falls squarely under the category of new rules of criminal procedure that do not apply retroactively\
• explaining that Supreme Court decisions, such as Ring, Blakely, and Booker, applying Apprendi’s “prototypical procedural rule” in various contexts are not retroactive
• Booker does not apply retroactively to petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).