Skip to main content
· 10/20/1986

Victor v. Home Sav. of America

Citations

  • 645 F. Supp. 1486
  • 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1020
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ”[E]xcess assets revert to the employer. However, assets are not considered in excess unless all benefits accrued as of the date of termination ‘are all provided for by the purchase of annuity contracts...quoting the Joint Implementation Guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nangle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.