Skip to main content
· 10/16/1922

Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Starr Piano Co.

Citations

  • 260 U.S. 726
  • 43 S. Ct. 89
  • 67 L. Ed. 483
  • 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that expert testimony would “unquestionably be necessary” in informed consent case based upon failure of physician to advise patient about alternative medical treatments and, therefore, screening certificate of merit would be required
  • explaining that, if court undertakes good faith analysis and finds plaintiff’s efforts 5 to promote the statutory purposes wanting, it may dismiss the complaint without prejudice to ensure that it does not restrict access to court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.