Victor Ponce v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a post-conviction defendant has met their threshold burden for relief by demonstrating that the trial court failed to give the requisite advisements during the guilty plea hearing
• finding no difference between a translated “advisement from the mouth of the court-appointed interpreter” and the same advisement from the trial court
• reviewing post‐conviction proceedings and explaining that the failure to advise a criminal defendant of his constitutional rights prior to accepting a guilty plea will result in reversal of the conviction
• reviewing post-conviction proceedings and explaining that the failure to advise a criminal defendant of his constitutional rights prior to accepting a guilty plea will result in reversal of the conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).