Victor Paul Soileau v. Ford Motor Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff’s testimony that he suffered a hyperflexion injury insufficient to avoid judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of defendant where medical experts for both sides stated that plaintiff’s spinal injury was the result of hyperextension rather than hyperflexion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).