Skip to main content
· 1/3/2006

Victor Monroe v. Robert H. Kuhlman, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility

Citations

  • 433 F.3d 236
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19
  • 2006 WL 11129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of a habeas petition because the benefit of petitioner’s presence during an uncritical part of the proceedings was “speculative and likely to be minimal”
  • “[t]he [United States] Supreme Court has held that the right to be present at one’s criminal trial is protected by due process in cases [in which] . . . the claimed error does not relate to the defendant’s opportunity to confront witnesses or evidence”
  • [t]he [United States] Supreme Court has held that the right to be present at one’s criminal trial is protected by due process in cases [in which] . . . the claimed error does not relate to the defendant’s opportunity to confront witnesses or evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Feinberg, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.