Victor Manuel Quijano v. Maria Eugenia Amaya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where portion of sentence is not authorized by statute, it “must be excised from [the] otherwise valid sentence”
• holding that where portion of sentence is not authorized by statute, it \must be excised from [the] otherwise valid sentence\
• lack of a provision for “similar” or “like” offenses indicated that “the legislature plainly meant for these enumerated crimes to be the exclusive and complete list”
• lack of a provision for \similar\ or \like\ offenses indicated that \the legislature plainly meant for these enumerated crimes to be the exclusive and complete list\
• because the statute lacked a provision for \similar\ or \like\ offenses, \the legislature plainly meant for these enumerated crimes to be the exclusive and complete list\
• plain language of RCW 9.94A.411 authorizes community custody only for enumerated offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).