Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that claimant’s failure to seek treatment was evidence that his pain was not as unrelenting as he claimed
• holding that gaps in the medical evidence -26- constitute “evidence” and that such gaps conflict with claims of “unrelenting pain”
• holding that gaps in the medical evidence constitute \evidence\ and that such gaps conflict with claims of \unrelenting pain\
• holding that gaps in claimant’s medical record may be considered as evidence that an injury is not as severe as alleged
• holding that a court “must uphold the [Commissioner’s] findings ...ifa reasonable mind, reviewing the evidence as a whole, could accept it as adequate to support his conclusion.”
• holding that a court “must uphold the [Commissioner’s] findings. . . if a reasonable mind, reviewing the evidence as a whole, could accept it as adequate to support his conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).