Victor G Everett v. Sarah K Everett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate court ordinarily lacks jurisdiction over an untimely application for discretionary appeal
• recognizing that “[c]ivil litigants typically do not enjoy a constitutional right to counsel,” under the United States Constitution and noting no additional right under the Georgia Constitution
• holding that an appellate court lacks jurisdiction over an untimely application for discretionary appeal
• holding that an appellate court lacks jurisdiction over an untimely application for discretionary appeal
• holding that an appellate court lacks jurisdiction over an untimely application for discretionary appeal
• holding that an appellate court lacks jurisdiction over an untimely application for discretionary appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).