Victor Daniel Santana v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rule 403 findings should not be disturbed unless the trial court abused its discretion
• explaining that weighing and balancing the Rule 403 factors falls within the trial court’s discretion and “will not be disturbed on appeal unless it has been clearly abused”
• finding no prejudice where erroneously admitted statements were “merely cumulative to other testimony”
• applying inherent tendency test to uphold trial court’s Rule 403 determination
• finding erroneous admission of hearsay evidence was harmless when issue is uncontested
• woman's recorded opinion that she believed her boyfriend's confession to her that he had murdered his ex-wife ruled admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).