Skip to main content
· 4/13/2004

Victor Cweklinsky, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Mobil Chemical Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 364 F.3d 68
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 682
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[P]romissory estoppel permits recovery based on a sufficiently clear and definite promise, even in the absence of the consideration required to create a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Jacobs, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.