Vickodil v. Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• PIGA was not liable for separate claim by wife for loss of consortium where it had already paid maximum amount on husband’s claim for bodily injury, which arose out of the same incident
• alloc. denied in 514 Pa. 639, 523 A.2d 346
• The court held that the terms of the insurance policy determined the meaning of “covered claim” in the Insurance Guaranty Act and if the claims were subject to the single person limit under the policy, •they are subject to the single $299,900 statutory cap.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).