· 2/20/1991
Vicki H. Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District 1, Janie Trueblood Lorraine Hollis Jack Holloway Tommy McCullar Dr. Roy Honeywell
Citations
- 926 F.2d 959
- 18 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1292
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2609
- 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,590
- 55 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 349
- 1991 WL 18296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “a federal court applying a state’s limitations periods should apply that state’s tolling provisions as well”
- “When Congress has provided a federal statute of limitation for a federal claim, . . . state tolling and saving provisions are not applicable.”
- “When Congress has provided a federal statute of limitation for a federal claim, . . . state tolling and saving provisions are not applicable.”
- “In the absence of a statute to the contrary, the limitation period is not tolled during the pendency of the dismissed action.”
- “Title VII requires that a plaintiff bring a judicial action within ninety days of receipt of a right-to-sue letter. . . . . [T]he filing of a complaint that is dismissed without prejudice does not toll the statutory filing period of Title VII.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKay, Seymour, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.