Vickers v. Vickers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the Supreme Court emphasized that the complaint failed “to allege any act of personal violence or a course of physical treatment such as would endanger life, limb or health and render cohabitation unsafe”
• “The essential elements of desertion are . . . (1) [c]essation from cohabitation for the required statutory period; (2) intent on the part of the absenting party not to resume it; (3) absence of the opposite party’s consent; and (4) absence of justification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moore v. City of Columbia
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-01-28· cited 8×
• Gibson v. Gibson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-10-23· cited 5×
• Bennefield v. Bennefield
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-11-11· cited 4×
• Berry v. Lindsay
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-06-16· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Machado v. Machado
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-08-31· cited 42×
• Mincey v. Mincey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-02-01· cited 26×
• Boozer v. Boozer
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-04-24· cited 9×