Vickers Petroleum Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \this court has rejected utilization ofhigh crime rates as a basis for imposing a tort duty\
• noting that \this court has rejected utilization ofhigh crime rates as a basis for imposing a tort duty\
• finding that the recognizable “ “high degree of risk of harm’ ” required for liability under § 302B was not present (emphasis omitted) (quoting Restatement § 302B cmt. e)
• noting that “‘[i]t would be unjust to require one to anticipate that a crime will be committed 14 No. 39571-5-III Nunley, et al v. Chelan-Douglas Health Dist. unless there has been a warning’” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted
• explaining that imposing a duty based on a high rate of crime in a location 'could have the undesired consequence of “the departure of businesses from urban core areas” (quoting Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue Associates, 116 Wash.2d 217, 802 P.2d 1360, 1370 (1991
• alteration 2 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. Meyers v. Ferndale Sch. Dist., No. 98280-5 (Gordon McCloud, J., concurring) in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).