Vick v. Dr. Nasreen Khan, Khan Obstetrics & Gynecology Assocs., P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that prior caselaw considering an ALJ’s decision to credit a non-treating physician’s opinion over a treating physician’s opinion is “legally inapposite” after the revisions to the opinion-evaluation regulations
• holding despite claimant’s contention, ALJ considered complaints about headaches, and concluding “it is not this Court’s role to reweigh the evidence”
• stating that “the ALJ is free to accept some, but not all, of a medical opinion”
• concluding “any legal error in the ALJ’s analysis [of medical opinion] was harmless” because it did would not have altered the disability determination
• Stating that “the ALJ is free to accept some, but not all, of a medical opinion.”
• finding that any error by the ALJ on conditions that are not the “primary basis” of a disability claim harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).