Skip to main content
· 10/7/1996

Vicary v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Citations

  • 942 F. Supp. 1146
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19251
  • 1996 WL 616419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding attorney’s fees to plaintiff in circumstances nearly identical to the case at bar, on the grounds that the railroad’s “effort to circumvent the integrity of the judicial process and the doctor-patient relationship ... endangers the right to counsel and a fair trial”
  • courts may supervise the course of pretrial discovery in FELA case despite existence of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. § 101

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.