Vicars v. Clarke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an additional impairment listed at step two satisfies the third requirement of Listing 12.05C
• recognizing “daily activities such as reading, driving, and cleaning are not necessarily inconsistent with mental retardation”
• listing 12.05C does not require diagnosis of intellectual disability; citing numerous cases finding same
• claimant satisfied first prong of 12.05C upon showing she attended special education classes through her graduation from high school, and still has struggles with reading and writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).