Viasystems, Inc. v. EBM-Papst St. Georgen GmbH & Co., KG

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court need not permit jurisdictional discovery when it is sought to support speculative or conclusory allegations
• holding that a prima facie case of specific personal jurisdiction could not be shown where plaintiff failed to allege facts to support the second Colder factor
• holding that \scattered\ emails and phone calls and a wire transfer of money to the forum state were \incidental contacts\ that were insufficient to establish specific jurisdiction
• holding that “scattered” emails and phone calls and a wire transfer of money to the forum state were “incidental contacts” that were insufficient to establish specific jurisdiction
• holding that “scattered e-mails, phone calls, and a wire-transfer of money” do not, without more, create a “deliberate and substantial connection” with the forum state (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• holding that “scattered e-mails, phone calls, and a wire-transfer of money” do not, without more, create a “deliberate and substantial connection” with the forum state (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).