Skip to main content
· 5/22/1996

Viam Corporation and Vehicle Power Accessories v. Iowa Export-Import Trading Co., and Spal S.R.L.

Citations

  • 84 F.3d 424
  • 38 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1833
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11682
  • 1996 WL 272219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the stream of commerce theory of Beverly Hills Fan could apply in the declaratory judgment context, where the patentee is the defendant
  • holding that the stream of commerce theory of Beverly Hills Fan could apply in the declaratory judgment context, where the patentee is the defendant
  • holding that it was not “unduly burdensome” to require the defendant to litigate in California because the defendant had initiated a declaratory judgment suit to enforce its patent in that forum
  • holding that it was not “unduly burdensome” to require an Italian patent owner to litigate in California, where the defendant had initiated a declaratory judgment suit regarding its patent in the same forum
  • holding that exercising personal jurisdiction over the defendant in the forum state was fair because the defendant had initiated a different suit in that state, thus demonstrating that it “has found a way to shoulder successfully the burden of litigating” there
  • emphasizing that \fair play and substantial justice\ are important considerations in personal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Plager, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.