· 9/2/2009
Viado v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
Citations
- 217 P.3d 199
- 230 Or. App. 531
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding, based on a comparable “Standard Franchise Agreement,” and “Manager’s Reference Guide,” that “Domino’s did not retain the right to control [the franchisee] in the way that an employer controls an employee”
- affirming grant of summary judgment to Domino’s on vicarious liability claim because Domino’s did not control the daily performance of the delivery drivers of the franchisee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.