Skip to main content
· 9/2/2009

Viado v. Domino's Pizza, LLC

Citations

  • 217 P.3d 199
  • 230 Or. App. 531
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding, based on a comparable “Standard Franchise Agreement,” and “Manager’s Reference Guide,” that “Domino’s did not retain the right to control [the franchisee] in the way that an employer controls an employee”
  • affirming grant of summary judgment to Domino’s on vicarious liability claim because Domino’s did not control the daily performance of the delivery drivers of the franchisee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.