VFD v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court abused its discretion in relying on the prosecutor’s argument that knowledge of the defendant’s criminal history may prove useful in a future case, as that reasoning would be applicable to any case
• \The trial court abused its discretion by not hearing evidence and exercising its discretion based on the facts and circumstances of [the] case.\
• “The trial court abused its discretion by not hearing evidence and exercising its discretion based on the facts and circumstances of [the] ease.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).