Veuve v. Righter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the treating physician opinion should not have been rejected merely because his choice of treatment was conservative
• finding that “over a four-year period” a treating source was “able to ‘develop a longitudinal picture’ of [p]laintiff’s medical history and impairments’”
• ALJ impermissibly substituted own opinion for that of treating physician when he determined that treating physician’s findings were “essentially normal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).