Skip to main content
· 2/12/2024

Vestmont Limited, Pets. v. DOT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the Eleventh Amendment bars all litigation in federal courts against the state and stating that “[t]he usual way around this is to name some agents . . . and to argue that their acts implementing an unconstitutional statute exceed their authority.”
  • dissenting opinion; the majority did not resolve the Board’s status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.