Vest v. Travelers Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inability of JCC to rule on constitutional issues does not preclude claimant from building record so that constitutional challenge might be made on appeal
• holding that the inability of the judge of compensation claims to rule on constitutional issues does not preclude a claimant from building a record so that the constitutional challenge might be made on appeal
• stating carrier’s failure to establish that disclosure of bare attorney time and rates would have chilling effect upon client’s willingness to disclose fully its “circumstances,” resulting in conclusion that such matters were not protected by attorney-client privilege
• “The hours expended and rate charged by defense counsel is not information protected by either the attorney-client or work product privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).