Vess Beverages, Inc. v. The Paddington Corporation, Morgan Furze, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a typed name placed on a document with intent to authenticate fulfills statute of frauds signature requirement
• a typed name placed on a document with intent to authenticate fulfills statute of frauds signature requirement
• “the signature need not be a legally effective assent to the contract, but the signer must sign with intent to indicate that the document is his”
• “Even if only one of the documents is signed, the requirement is satisfied as long as one document refers to the other, or their contents clearly show they are related.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).