Veskerna v. Erickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding motion for directed verdict properly overruled when sufficient contradictory evidence existed such that reasonable minds could draw various conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Farah v. Spence
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2023-04-04

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reavis v. Solminski
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-08-09· cited 72×
• Sacco v. Carothers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-08-15· cited 70×
• Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-27· cited 69×
• Walkenhorst v. State, Department of Roads
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-13· cited 60×
• Dolberg v. Paltani
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-06-14· cited 47×
• Hoover v. Burlington Northern Railroad
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-02-07· cited 46×
• Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic Marking
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-11-22· cited 33×
• Sedlak Aerial Spray, Ltd. v. Miller
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 30×
• Hamernick v. Essex Dodge Ltd.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-02-10· cited 23×
• Kent v. Crocker
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-05-09· cited 14×
• German v. Swanson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-07-26· cited 14×
• Veskerna v. CITY OF WEST POINT, NEB.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-05-01· cited 12×
• Fales v. Books
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-12-12· cited 11×