Skip to main content
· 8/6/2009

Verzani v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

Citations

  • 641 F. Supp. 2d 291
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126086
  • 2009 WL 2337927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]efendant’s motion to dismiss, which was directed to the original complaint, was mooted by the filing of the amended complaint.”
  • “[D]efendant’s motion to dismiss, which was directed to the original complaint, was mooted by the filing of the amended complaint.”
  • “[D]efendant’s motion to dismiss, which was directed to the original complaint, was mooted by the filing of the amended complaint.”
  • “[D]efendant’s motion to dismiss, which was directed to the original complaint, was mooted by the filing of the amended complaint.”
  • “[T]he court may not read [an] agreement to make any of its terms meaningless, or construe its language to render particular provisions ‘mere surplusage.’” (citations omitted)
  • “[W]here the claim is for breach of contract, the complaint is deemed to incorporate the contract by reference because the contract is integral to the plaintiffs’ claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMAHON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.