Verret v. Bourgeois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider bank statements offered by defendant with its motion to dismiss in an attempt to show that overdraft claims related to non-recurring debit transactions were time barred
• denying motion to dismiss where “there is a reasonable basis for a difference of opinion concerning” “whether the ‘Account Agreement’ terms indicate whether [the defendant] will use the ‘available’ balance or ‘ledger’ balance in determining overdraft fees”
• “When there are multiple writings regarding the same transaction, the writings should be considered together to determine the intent of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).