Verna Stone v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Edwards \retroactively applies to the present case because 'a rule enunciated in a case presumptively applies retroactively to pending cases' \
• evidence that, after crime was committed, defendant changed his cell phone number, evaded police, and lied about his identity sup- ported inference of consciousness of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).