Vermont Public Interest Research Group v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs may challenge NEPA analysis and implementation of program as whole even though they only established injury as to one area
• holding plaintiffs may challenge NEPA analysis and implementation of program as whole even though they only established injury as to one area
• noting that “those with merely generalized grievances” are precluded “from bringing suit to vindicate an interest common to the entire public” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• finding no justification to strike the plaintiff’s entire statement of undisputed material facts but declining to consider portions of the statement that were “argumentative and conclusory or include[d] information . . . outside the [APA’s] record rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).