Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc. v. Bandel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \the combination of administrative and adjudicative responsibilities of the [Commission] does demand an exacting balance\ (quotation omitted)
• holding “proceedings under 30 V.S.A. § 248 relate only to the issue of public good, not the interests of private landowners who are or may be involved”
• explaining that necessity analysis requires considering why project must \involve this particular property\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).