Skip to main content
· 12/23/1994

Vermillion v. Scarbrough (In Re Vermillion)

Citations

  • 176 B.R. 563
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 2080
  • 26 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 598
  • 1994 WL 736204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Securing real estate titles obtained through this method of conveyance is in Oregon’s basic interest. Invasion of this interest by applying some standard which represents a ‘reasonable’ or ‘fair’ price for any forfeited real estate is also unjustified.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polly S. Higdon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.