· 2/10/2009
Verizon California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Citations
- 555 F.3d 270
- 384 U.S. App. D.C. 342
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that certain entities were common carriers because, among other things, the entities certified that they would \serve[ ] all similarly situated customers equally\
- upholding FCC’s finding of common carriage even though the carriers served only their affiliates
- upholding FCC’s finding of common carriage even though the carriers served only their affiliates
- carrier affiliates were themselves carriers because they held themselves out to be carriers through their business practices
- affirming FCC’s approach in Bright House
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Tatel, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.