VeriFone, Inc. v. Limbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statutory filing requirements are jurisdictional and cannot be waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hambuechen v. 221 Market North, Inc.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-03-05· cited 6×
• Hafiz v. Levin
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-12-30· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 125×
• Akron Standard Division of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Lindley
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 32×
• Board of Education v. Board of Revision
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 14×
• Plowden & Roberts, Inc. v. Porterfield
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1970-03-25· cited 8×
• Servomation Corp. v. Kosydar
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-04-28· cited 7×
• Kilbarger Construction, Inc. v. Limbach
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 6×

Other cases named VeriFone, Inc. v. Limbach

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• VeriFone, Inc. v. Limbach
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-07-26