Veridyne Corporation v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that each of Veridyne’s 127 invoices for payment submitted to the agency on a government contract 44 was considered a separate “claim” for purposes of the FCA, and affirming the award of $11,000.00 for each of the 127 claims
• stating that each of 44 Veridyne’s 127 invoices for payment submitted to the agency on a government contract was considered a separate “claim” for purposes of the FCA, and affirming the award of $11,000.00 for each of the 127 claims
• affirming this Court’s decision finding a contractor liable pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A) where the contractor’s proposal contained false assertions of material fact designed to obtain a government contract
• affirming this Court’s decision finding a contractor liable pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A) where the contractor’s proposal contained false assertions of material fact designed to obtain a government contract
• “To prevail under section 2514, the [Government must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the contractor knew that its submitted claims ivere false, and that it intended to defraud the [GJovemment by submitting those claims.” (emphasis added and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).