Skip to main content
· 7/14/1988

Verheyden v. Verheyden

Citations

  • 757 P.2d 1328
  • 104 Nev. 342
  • 1988 Nev. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where there was no evidence that community funds were used toward the purchase price or to make improvements that increased the homes value, the property maintained its separate nature
  • holding that where there was no evidence that community funds were used toward the purchase price or to make SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 ' 101 1947A •tgo improvements that increased the home's value, the property maintained its separate nature
  • petition filed six months after service of parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.