Verdugo v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring court to assume that government officials have done their duty
• requiring court to assume that government officials have done their duty
• public officials “presumed to have done their duty” and their acts “are presumed to be correct and legal in absence of clear and 42 convincing evidence to the contrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-04-02· cited 111×
• Teratron General v. Institutional Investors Trust
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-09-12· cited 15×
• McDonald v. Thomas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-19· cited 10×
• Stemkowski v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-09-23· cited 7×
• Carranza v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-12-17· cited 6×
• Beatie v. Beatie
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-08-13· cited 5×
• Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-06-30· cited 5×
• Raymond L Malnar v. Elizabeth Joice
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2014-11-14· cited 4×
• Chavez v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-04-16· cited 4×
• Mills v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-01-09· cited 4×
• Land v. Industrial Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-05-01· cited 3×
• State v. Westby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-09· cited 3×
• McDonald v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-02· cited 2×
• Hume v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-02-28· cited 1×
• Benson v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-02-06· cited 1×
• Church v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-02-01

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 129×
• Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. Skousen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1941-01-13· cited 37×
• Hunt v. Campbell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1917-12-22· cited 30×
• United States v. Howard C. Hayes and Gladys I. Hayes, His Wife, Stanwood P. Whiteley and Margaret Whiteley, His Wife
  Ninth Circuit· 1966-12-08· cited 27×
• Mar De Passy Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1941-10-13· cited 23×
• Covington v. Basich Bros. Const. Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1951-07-03· cited 22×
• Board of Supervisors v. Udall
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1931-07-13· cited 18×
• Burri Ex Rel. Carpenter v. Campbell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-12-07· cited 17×
• Industrial Commission of Arizona v. J. & J. CONST. CO.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1951-07-12· cited 16×
• Benites v. Industrial Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-04-13· cited 16×
• Verdugo v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-09-21· cited 7×
• Benites v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-01-06· cited 6×
• Cauley v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-03-02· cited 5×
• Land v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-10-19· cited 5×

Other cases named Verdugo v. Industrial Commission

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Verdugo v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-02-08· cited 13×
• Verdugo v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-09-21· cited 7×
• Verdugo v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-09-21· cited 6×
• Verdugo v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-12-03· cited 5×
• Verdugo v. Industrial Commission
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03