Skip to main content
· 9/14/2009

Verdugo-Gonzalez v. Holder

Citations

  • 581 F.3d 1059
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20377
  • 2009 WL 2914467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming that a theft offense must contain the element of criminal intent to deprive the owner of rights and benefits of ownership in finding that the knowing receipt of stolen property under section 496(a) of the California Penal Code was an aggravated felony
  • Vidal \examined ... a statute that expressly included within its reach the actions of an accessory.\
  • Vidal “examined . . . a statute that expressly included within its reach the actions of an accessory.”
  • Vidal “examined . . . a statute that expressly included within its reach the actions of an accessory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silverman, Clifton, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.