Verbance v. Altman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our supreme court has expressed approval of Soto’s gatekeeping approach.” (citing Decker v. Libell, 193 Ill. 2d 250, 254 (2000))
• “A trial judge must have considerable leeway in deciding *** how to go about determining whether a particular [medical] expert’s testimony is reliable.”
• \A trial judge must have considerable leeway in deciding *** how to go about determining whether a particular [medical] expert's testimony is reliable.\
• \Our supreme court has expressed approval of Soto's gatekeeping approach.\ (citing Decker v. Libell, 193 Ill. 2d 250, 254 (2000))
• \Our supreme court has expressed approval of Soto's gatekeeping approach.\ (citing Decker v. Libell, 193 Ill. 2d 250, 254 (2000))
• \A trial judge must have considerable leeway in deciding *** how to go about determining whether a particular [medical] expert's testimony is reliable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).