Verb v. Motorola, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claims against cellular telephone manufacturers alleging potential safety defects because \plaintiffs' future personal injury and damages claims constitute conjecture and speculation\
• dismissing claims against cellular telephone manufacturers alleging potential safety defects because “plaintiffs’ future personal injury and damages claims constitute conjecture and speculation”
• dismissing claims against cellular telephone manufacturers alleging potential safety defects because “plaintiffs’ future personal injury and damages claims constitute conjecture and speculation”
• plaintiff failed to allege actual damage where allegations were based on mere theoretical possibilities of injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).