Verano Alabama, LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-901165).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the procedural safeguards requirement generally “comes into play” where “an explicit censorship scheme—which by definition is not content-neutral—is under attack”
• focusing on nonpublic fora national cemeteries and assuming the remainder of VA property was nonpublic when Griffin only argued regarding cemeteries
• “Challenged terms must be read in context of the regulation as a whole[.]”
• rule vesting discretion in VA administrators to ensure that cemeteries remain “sacred to the honor and 36 memory of those interred or memorialized there” was reasonable in light of characteristic nature and function of national cemeteries
• “Even unwritten speech policies may survive constitutional challenge if uniformly enforced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).