· 4/1/1992
VENTURTECH II v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Citations
- 790 F. Supp. 576
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4801
- 1992 WL 72578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a cause of action for aiding and abetting a securities violation first requires “a primary violation by another person”
- noting that aiding and abetting a violation of similar federal securities law requires “a primary violation by another person”
- dismissing aiding and abetting claims against [accountants] because the plaintiffs \ha[d] not presented any evidence indicating that [the accountants] conducted [their] audits with a 'high conscious intent' to aid a securities violation\
- similar internal memorandum created in connection with a prior audit held insufficient to establish a “limited group of persons whom [the auditor] knew would rely on its work” or to establish the state of the auditor’s knowledge four years after the memorandum was prepared
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Malcolm J. Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.