Skip to main content
· 4/1/1992

VENTURTECH II v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells

Citations

  • 790 F. Supp. 576
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4801
  • 1992 WL 72578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a cause of action for aiding and abetting a securities violation first requires “a primary violation by another person”
  • noting that aiding and abetting a violation of similar federal securities law requires “a primary violation by another person”
  • dismissing aiding and abetting claims against [accountants] because the plaintiffs \ha[d] not presented any evidence indicating that [the accountants] conducted [their] audits with a 'high conscious intent' to aid a securities violation\
  • similar internal memorandum created in connection with a prior audit held insufficient to establish a “limited group of persons whom [the auditor] knew would rely on its work” or to establish the state of the auditor’s knowledge four years after the memorandum was prepared

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Malcolm J. Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.