Venturella v. Gober

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a) and (d) do not apply when the claimant does not possess the requisite service because there is no legal entitlement to service connection
• holding that the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a) and (d) do not apply when the claimant does not possess the requisite service because there is no legal entitlement to service connection
• Board’s determination of well-groundedness is harmless error where claimant could not prevail as a matter of law based upon lack of legal entitlement to service
• defining evidence which may be used in such determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carpenter v. West
  Veterans Claims· 1998-03-24· cited 27×
• Roderick C. Stallworth v. R. James Nicholson
  Veterans Claims· 2006-11-15· cited 22×
• Daniels v. Gober
  Veterans Claims· 1997-11-03· cited 12×
• Wilson v. West
  Veterans Claims· 1998-08-20· cited 9×
• Allen - Key v. Nicholson
  Veterans Claims· 2007-03-16· cited 8×
• Keith A. Roberts v. Eric K. Shinseki
  Veterans Claims· 2010-04-23· cited 7×
• Pacheco v. West
  Veterans Claims· 1998-11-18· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Russell v. Principi
  Veterans Claims· 1992-10-06· cited 358×
• Sabonis v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1994-04-28· cited 339×
• Damrel v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1994-02-18· cited 147×
• Edenfield v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1995-11-01· cited 59×
• Duro v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1992-07-08· cited 44×
• Graves v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1994-02-10· cited 12×
• Cahall v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1994-12-19· cited 10×
• Smith v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1992-03-12· cited 7×
• Cacalda v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1996-07-31· cited 6×