Skip to main content
· 3/29/1996

Venter v. Venter

Citations

  • 545 N.W.2d 431
  • 249 Neb. 712
  • 1996 Neb. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that it was error to treat husband’s accounts receivable as marital property subject to division and as income for purposes of child support
  • “The district court’s determination of this value was not clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Caporale, Lanphier, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Fahrnbruch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.