Ventas, Inc. v. Health Care Property Investors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a tortious-interference claim “fail[ed]” because the plaintiff had not satisfied the “critical element” of showing an underlying breach of contract
• “Under Kentucky law, significantly wrongful conduct certainly includes fraudulent misrepresentation, deceit, coercion, threats of illegal conduct, and physical violence, which are specifically highlighted as improper acts.”
• “A valid business expectancy exists when there is ‘a reasonable likelihood or a probability, not mere wishful thinking’ that a business relationship will come about.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).