Venning v. Roe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defense counsel’s remarks accusing the plaintiffs medical expert of perjury and accusing opposing counsel of unethically committing a fraud on the court would not be condoned
• reversing denial of new trial where counsel's remarks were \highly prejudicial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).